Home of projectPDQ™
Designing and Delivering projects for business benefit - development and implementation.
Diagnosing and Fixing Project Problems in Information Systems
projects.
Who are
projectPDQ?
A niche consultancy focused on
diagnosis and solutions provision for problematic information systems
projects. Phil Marks, the Principal, is a programme and project manager with over 20 years international
consulting experience in both software development and implementation.
What is
projectPDQ?
A structured and repeatable approach to assessing the quality of a project resulting in a Project Diagnostic
Quotient and a delivery or problem resolution plan.
A project can be diagnosed at inception (even conception) stage - this takes a view of all the risk factors to
produce a balanced PDQ. These factors include:
Organisational Factors
- Capability Maturity Model - organisations may score well on this scale but
projects may still fail because of poor design or project-specific
factors.
- Project InDigestion - an organisation may score well on CMM, but under
relentless and highly pressured business change rates, the capacity of the organisation to digest a particular
project at a particular time may be very limited, with inter-project dependencies and resource scarcity setting
a project up for failure.
Project Factors
- project-specific technology literacy
- requirements clarity
- business process model quality
- scale of change
- rate of business change anticipated during the project lifecycle
- training requirements
- resource requirements
- proposed methodology
Project PDQ is not a remote self service diagnostic tool. Such tools produce feedback that is based
on the input of interested parties. That introduces the risk of bias. Projects are about people working together
effectively.
The technique uses experienced consultants (with never less that 15 years senior experience) for design of new
projects and investigation of failing projects. The use of highly experienced consultants means that a sharp focus
is rapidly developed on the key problem areas.
This leads to short timescale indication of problem resolution strategies, so minimising misdirected project
cash burn.
How does it work?
It is based on
- a series of structured interviews across the key stakeholders, and
suppliers (internal and external).
- review of the project collateral - knowledgebase and the project planning, control, requirements, design
and test artifacts.
The Project Diagnostic Quotient is based on an objective calculation of these factors weighted heavily towards
the consultant's assessment of the tangible project artifacts.
It is not a case of 'hiring a consultant to tell me the time and then lending her my watch". We bring real
experience to bear on projects.
Why should an organisation use
projectPDQ?
The reasons are manifold, but typically:
New Projects
- initiate a new project with best practice and an objective assessment of the risks.
Problem Projects
- unbiased external assessment of project problems
- make internal political issues visible
- put the spotlight on 'the elephant in the room'
- objectively moderated discussion of the issues
- resolution plans originated outside the organisation thereby enabling easier internal ownership and
- uniting the project personnel in a jointly owned resolution plan
What types of project does
projectPDQ suit?
The service is appropriate for
software development, infrastructure and migration projects, where total project effort is more than about 100
man-days.
The approach is
technology-independent. If a project is failing because of technology issues then that is an indication
of methodology issues. Whilst resolution may require technology-specific answers, the systemic methodology
issue will still need to be addressed to avoid its reappearing in another project. Systemic methodology issues may
include, for example: project sizing, planning and scheduling which is out of phase with the rate of
business change; a deficient recruitment process; poor business requirements gathering and sign-off; lack of
project standards; inappropriate toolsets; inadequate quality system; inadequate test
processes.
Want to know more?
Contact me to arrange an introductory meeting.
If you want to know more about high productivity website building and marketing tools, then look at
www.ezeesoft.co.uk
|